EDP Sciences logo
Rechercher
Menu
All issues Volume 20 / No 3 (2008) Ann Toxicol Anal, 20 3 (2008) 145-153 References
Open Access
Issue
Ann Toxicol Anal
Volume 20, Number 3, 2008
Page(s) 145 - 153
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ata/2009015
Published online 19 March 2009
  1. Yoo Y. Forensic Science & Criminal Investigation : Hyeonamsa Co, 2002 [in Korean]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Drummer OH. Drug testing in oral fluid. Clin Biochem Rev. 2006; 27: 147–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kintz P. Drug testing in Hair. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim E. Comparison of methamphetamine concentrations in oral fluid, urine and hair of twelve drug abusers using solid-phase extraction and GC-MS. 46th The International Association of Forensic scientists (TIAFT) meeting. Martinique, France, June 2–8, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. Han E, Yang W, Lee J, Park Y, Kim E, Lim M, Chung H. Correlation of methamphetamine results and concentrations between head, axillary, and pubic hair. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 147: 21–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Han E, Yang W, Lee J, Park Y, Kim E, Lim M, Chung H. The prevalence of MDMA/MDA in both hair and urine in drug users. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 152: 73–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Han E, Park Y, Yang W, Lee J, Lee S, Kim E, Lim M, Chung H. The study of metabolite-to parent drug ratios of methamphetamine and methylenedioxy- methmaphetamine in hair. Forensic Sci Int. 2006; 161: 124–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Verstraete AG. Oral fluid testing for driving under the influence of drugs: history, recent progress and remaining challenges. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 150: 143–150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bush DM. The U.S. Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs: Current status and future considerations. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 174: 111–119. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DHHS (Department of Health and Human Service), Proposed revisions to mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs. Fed Register. 2004; 69: 19673–19732. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chung H, Park M, Choi S, Son H, Yang W, Choi H. Guideline of drug testing in urine. Korean Journal of Forensic Science. 2001; 2: 216–220 [in Korean]. [Google Scholar]
  12. Peters F. Analytical Method Development and Validation. FBI Laboratory Symposium on Forensic Toxicology. Washington DC, USA, August 29–30, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schepers RJF, Oyler JM, Joseph J. RE, Cone EJ, Moolchan ET, Huestis MA. Methamphetamine and amphetamine pharmacokinetics in oral fluid and plasma after controlled oral methamphetamine administration to human volunteers. Clin Chem. 2003; 49: 121–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huestis MA, Cone EJ. Methamphetamine disposition in oral fluid, plasma, and urine. Ann. Acad. Sci. N.Y. 2007; 1098: 104–121. [Google Scholar]
  15. Raes E, Verstraete A, Lillsunde P, Gunnar T, Laloup M, Christopherse A, Moeller M, Hammer K. Relationship between oral fluid and blood concentrations of drugs of abuse in drivers suspected of DUID. 46th International Association of Forensic scientists (TIAFT) meeting, Martinique, France, June 2–8, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wennig R. Potential problems with the interpretation of hair analysis results. Forensic Sci Int. 2000; 107: 5–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nakahara Y, Hananjiri R. Hair analysis for drugs of abuse. XXI. Effect of para-substituents on benzene ring of methamphetamine on drug incorporation into rat hair. Life Science. 2000; 66: 563–574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]